http://www.mistresssuzette.com/sitemap.html
http://www.mistresssuzette.com/t/cp8.html
BREAKING A SUBMISSIVE


Breaking is a term often heard within the BDSM community. The interpretation of what
breaking means varies. In this area it is most often aligned with the 'breaking' of a horse or animal.
Based on this interpretation the 'spirit' of the individual is being 'broken'. Some people like to
consider it that point where the 'will' gives way to a superior force. The actual breaking of an
individual's spirit is the last thing that a competent, healthy Dominant or submissive wishes to
occur. The breaking of a 'spirit' removes the positive mental health of the individual. This would be
similar to involuntary imprisonment such as during a war in a POW camp. It represents a desire
to 'break down' the fundamental building blocks of the individuals psyche until they can no longer
defend themselves from external invasion. The vanquishment of hope, self-respect and motivation
to continue.

Sometimes a submissive believes that they need to be 'forced', 'conquered', or 'overcome' in
order to maintain a level of self respect in submitting to another human being. It is a way they
justify their need. This belief is erroneous and generally indicates an individual who has not openly
embraced their needs or their self. It is also a way of avoiding self responsibility and imposing
responsibility for your submissive conduct and responses onto your Dominant.

Many submissives approach Dominants asking to be 'broken'. Based on the wide range of what
this term means the Dominant is often confronted with conflicting thoughts as to what exactly the
submissive is asking of them. A Dominant does not break a submissive. A submissive is not to be
forced beyond their mental and physical limits. Such force is abuse!

Many submissives interpret 'breaking' to be a Dominant overwhelming their desire to resist
thereby 'forcing' them into obedience. Again, this is based on a flawed understanding of the
dynamics at work here. A submissive overcomes their own desires to resist. Control is exercised
from within. To some extent the Dominant presents the submissive with increasingly difficult
mental and physical tasks to perform. The submissive by 'agreement' endeavors to perform these
tasks as issued.

A Dominant directs action and resists the ability or desire of the submissive to manipulate them.
The submissive either follows direction or they do not. Based on the negotiated agreements of the
relationship structure the Dominant and the submissive then engage in actions in response to
actions or failure. However, it is crucial to remember that the submissive is completely responsible
for their actions. The desire to obey or disobey is a voluntary process. Some relationships flourish
with 'tiny wars' between the Dominant and submissive. Or, ongoing subtle insurrection. Others
require a stronger demonstration. Many Dominants find a 'level of resistance' exciting and
challenging in their submissive. Others desire a submissive capable of total self control.

A person expressing an ability or desire to 'break' another human being should be avoided by a
submissive. That person is not a Dominant with a vested interest in the overall mental and physical
health of a submissive. Such a desire demonstrates personal issues and problems which may be
severe and could place a submissive in a situation of grave risk to them.
.